NEW LAW REPORTS - VOLUME 39
- ABDUL AZIZ v. MOHAMED BUHARY
- ABDUL WAHAB v. A. J. PERERA et al
- ABEYSEKERA v. GOONEWARDENE
- ABEYWARDENE et al. v. TYRELL et al
- AMMAL et al. v. IBRAHIM et al
- AMMAL et al. v. IBRAHIM et al
- APPUHAMY v. MUDIYANSE et al
- APPUWA v. HOMAPALA et al
- ARUNACHALAM CHETTIAR v. PAULIS APPUHAMY
- BALASUBRAMANIAM v. VALLIAPPAR CHETTIAR
- CADER SAIBO & CO. v. MOWLANA
- CHELLIAH PILLAI v. DEVADASON et al
- CHELLIAH v. COOPER
- CHELLIAH v. FERNANDO
- CHITHRAPOOPALAPILLAI v. CHINNIAH et al
- CHIVERS & SONS, LTD v. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
- COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX v. SAVERIMUTTU CHETTY
- COOPER v. DE SARAM
- COSMAS v. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
- CUMARASINGHE v. ABEYRATNE
- DADA v. THE BRITISH CORPORATION, LTD
- DE NEISE v. SAMBUNATHAN et al
- DE SILVA v. DE MEL
- DE SILVA v. DON CAROLIS & SONS, LTD
- DHAMMASIRI THERUNNANSE v. SUDIRANANDO THERUNNANSE
- DHARMALINGAM CHETTY v. VADIVEL CHETTY et al
- DIAS v. DE SILVA
- DON ASLIN v. SAMARAKONE BROS
- ELONONA v. FERNANDO
- FERNANDO et al. v. FERNANDO
- FERNANDO v. PEIRIS et al
- GNANAPRAKASAM et al. v. MARIAIPILLAI
- GUNASEKERE v. DIAS BANDARANAIKE
- GUNETILEKE (S-I., POLICE) v. NEPO SINGHO et al
- HAFEEL v. IBRAHIM et al
- HALALDEEN v. YOTHAN
- HANIFFA v. SALIM
- HULL, BLYTH & CO. v. VALIAPPA CHETTIAR
- IBRAHIM SAIBO et al. v. PHILIPS
- IMBULDENIYA v. ROMANIS APPUHAMY
- In re APPLICATION BY NEIL HEWAVITARANA FOR AN AUTHORIZED EXCUSE UNDER ARTICLE
- In re APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF Mandamus ON THE ASSISTANT GOVERNMENT AGENT, UVA
- In re MARK ANTONY LYSTER BRACEGIRDLE
- IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION OF A PROCTOR TO BE RE- ADMITTED AND RE-ENROLLED
- In the Matter of a Rule under Section 51 of the Courts Ordinance on H. A. J. Hul
- IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION BY A. A. PERERA FOR A WRIT OF Quo Warranto TO S
- IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION TO BE RE – ADMITTED AND RE – ENROLLED AS AN AD
- INSPECTOR OF EXCISE v. PALANIMUTTU
- JAYARATNE et al. v. ZOYSA
- JAYAWARDENE et al. v. JAYAWARDENE
- JOHN APPUHAMY v. WILLIAM APPUHAMY
- JULIUS et al. v. PODISINGHO et al
- JURY v. ATTORNEY-GENERAL et al
- K. DHAMMANANDA v. DAVITH RANASINGHE
- KANAPATHIPILLAI . KASINATHER et al
- KANDANA POLICE v. EDMUND
- KANDASAMYTHEWAR v. CASSIM
- KANDY CO-OPERATIVE URBAN BANK v. SENANAYAKE et al
- KARUNANAYAKE v. KARUNANAYAKE
- KEERTHIRATNE v. KARUNAWATHIE
- KERN et al. v. WICKREMESINGHE
- KOTALAWALA v. PERERA
- KOWLA UMMA v. MOHIDEEN
- LETCHIMAN v. MURUGAPPA v. CHETTIAR
- LEVER BROS v. R. M. RENGANATHAN PILLAI
- MAHA NAYAKA THERO, MALWATTA VIHARE v. REGISTRAR-GENERAL et al
- MARIKAR v. PUNCHIHEWA
- MARTIN et al. v. COMMISSIONER OF STAMPS
- MENCHINA HAMINE v. JAMES APPU
- MERCANTILE BANK OF INDIA, LTD v. RAMANATHAN CHETTIAR
- MOHAMED BHAI v. DIYAIVA et al
- MOLAGODA v. GUNARATNA
- MOOSAJEE et al. v. PEIRIS
- MUNASINGHE v. ELIYATAMBY
- MURUGAPPAH CHETTIAR et al. v. RAMANATHAN CHETTIAR
- MUTHALIPH v. MANSOOR et al
- NAIR v. ALEXANDER et al
- NATCHIAPPA CHETTIAR v. PESONAHAMY
- NESADURAY v. AMARASINGHE
- NUGAWELA v. RATWATTE et al
- PAIVA v. MARIKAR et al
- PARAMSOTHY v. SUPPRAMANIAM
- PARANGODEN v. RAMAN et al
- PATHMANATHAN v. THE IMPERIAL BANK OF INDIA
- PEIRIS v. FERNANDO
- PERERA v. AGALAWATTE et al
- PERKINS v. DEWADASAN
- PIYARATNE UNNANSE v. SONUTHTHARA UNNANSE
- POLICE SERGEANT HENDRICK v. ARUMUGAM et al
- POLICE SERGEANT v. CHIANG FONG CHING
- PUNCHI APPUHAMY et al. v. APPUHAMY et al
- RAJARATNAM v. THE COMMISSIONER OF STAMPS
- RAJASURIAR v. RAJASURIAR et al
- RUTHIRA REDDIAR v. SUBBA REDDIAR
- SABAPATHI v. HUNTLEY
- SADANATHA KURUKKAL v. SUBRAMANIAN et al
- SAIBO v. MOHAMADU
- SAIBO v. NEW INDIA INSURANCE CO., LTD
- SALEE et al. v. NATCHIA et al
- SAMARASINGHE v. SECRETARY , DISTRICT COURT, MATARA
- SAMARASINGHE v. BANDA
- SAMINATHAN PILLAI v. DINGIRI AMMA et al
- SAMSUDEEN v. ABDUL WAHIB
- SANTIAGO v. SANTIAGO
- SATHIYANATHAN v. SATHIYANATHAN
- SAVARIMUTTU v. ANNAMAH
- SCHOKMAN v. NADAR
- SEELANANDA THERO v. RAJAPAKSE
- SEETHANGANIAMMAL v. ELIYAPERUMAL
- SENARATNE v. PERERA
- SENEVIRATNE v. KANAKARATNE
- SHORTER & CO. v. MOHAMED
- SILVA v. JAYAWEERA
- SILVA v. LOW-COUNTRY PRODUCTS ASSOCIATION
- SINNAPILLAI v. VEERAGATHY et al
- SINNAPPOO v. THEIVANAI et al
- SIRIWARDENE v. VANDERSTRAATEN
- SITHAYAMMA v. SINNIAH
- SUMANATISSA v. GUNERATNE
- SUMANGALA THERO v. PIYATISSA THERO
- SUPPIAH PILLAI et al. v. RAMANATHAN et al
- SUPPIAYA REDDIAR v. MOHAMED et al
- TALAISINGHAM v. MUUTIAH
- TAMBIAH v. SANGARAJAH
- THAMBY LEBBE et al. v. JAMALDEEN
- THANGAMMA v. NAGALINGAM
- THE KING v. ELIATAMBY et al
- THE KING v. GABRIEL et al
- THE KING v. GUNASEKERE
- THE KING v. MENDIS et al
- THE KING v. THOLIS SILVA et al
- THE KING v. SAYANERIS et al
- THE KING v. WEERASINGHE
- THEVANAI et al. v. SINNAPPU
- THIRUNAYAKAR v. THIRUNAYAKAR
- THURAIRATNAM v. MOHIDEEN PICHAI
- TILLAINATHAN v. NAGALINGAM
- TOCHINA v. DANIEL
- VANDENDRIESEN v. HOUWA UMMA
- VANDERPOORTEN v. PEIRIS
- VELLUPILLAI v. THE CHAIRMAN , URBAN DISTRICT COUNCIL
- WEERAPPERUMA et al. v. WEERAPPERUMA
- WEERASINGHE v. PETER
- WICKRAMASURIYA et al. v. DE SILVA et al
- WICKREMANAYAKE v. JOHN APPUHAMY
- WICKREMANAYAKE v. THE TIMES OF CEYLON LIMITED
- WIJESINGHE v. TEA EXPORT CONTROLLER
- WIJEYEWARDENE v. RAYMOND
- WIJEYMANNE v. SINNATAMBY
- WIJEYSINGHE (S-I., POLICE) v. DHANAPALA
- WIJEYSURIYA v. DALPADATU
- WIMALASEKERE v. DINGIRIMAHATMAYA et al
- WITTENSLEGER v. APPUHAMY et al
- WRIGHT v. MUNASINGHE et al
- ZAHIRA UMMA v. ABEYSINGHE et al
