Category / SLLR_1992_V_1
THURAIRAJAH v. BIBILE CHAIRMAN BOARD OF REVIEW CEILING ON HOUSING PROPE
015-SLLR-SLLR-1992-V-1-THURAIRAJAH-v.-BIBILE-CHAIRMAN-BOARD-OF-REVIEW-CEILING-ON-HOUSING-PROPE.pdf THURAIRAJAH v. BIBILE, CHAIRMAN, BOARD OF REVIEW CEILING ON HOUSINGPROPERTY LAW AND OTHERS COURT OF APPEALPALAKIDNAR, J. GUNAWARDANA, J. ANDWEERASEKARA, J. CA. 535/88; C.H.P. BOARD OF REVIEW 154218 AND 19 FEBRUARY 1991 Ceiling on Housing Property Law, No. 1 of 1973 – Eligibility of tenant to purchaseexcess house – Can sub-tenant claim right…
RATNASIRI PERERA v. DISSANAYAKE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF CO-OPERATIVE
031-SLLR-SLLR-1992-V-1-RATNASIRI-PERERA-v.-DISSANAYAKE-ASSISTANT-COMMISSIONER-OF-CO-OPERATIVE-.pdf RATNASIRI PERERA ' v. DISSANAYAKE, ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF CO-OPERATIVEDEVELOPMENT AND OTHERS SUPREME COURT, BANDARANAYAKE, J„ M. D. H. FERNANDO, J. ANDAMERASINGHE, J. S.C. REFERENCES 1 to 17/91 (Consolidated) C.A. APPLICATIONS 1060/85, 713/83, 1528/83, 1373/82, 1069/84, 27/84, 32/84,1006/84,1068/84,1267/84,1666/84, 1623/84,32/85, 62/85,559/85, 344/85,976/8531 JULY AND 01 AUGUST, 1991. Judicial Power – Does arbitrator appointed by the…
CHANDRASOMA PERERA v. SULAIMAN PILLAI ADAM
016-SLLR-SLLR-1992-V-1-CHANDRASOMA-PERERA-v.-SULAIMAN-PILLAI-ADAM.pdf CHANDRASOMA PERERA v.SULAIMAN PILLAI ADAM COURT Of APPEAL wijetunga; J. &ananqacqqmaraswamy, j. C;A, NO. 458/81(F) 0;6.:eOLOM60NO. 743/ED1 T^tARCH 1991 CivilPrpcedure – Substitution in a rent and ejectment suit of partner in business -CiirH Procedure 'Code,' Sections 394 and 760A – Rules of the Supreme Court -Executor-de-sqh-ton. ■; ." In a rent and ejectment…
SUBBASH CHANDRA FERNANDO v. KAPILARATNE OFFICER-IN-CHARGE POLICE STATIO
032-SLLR-SLLR-1992-V-1-SUBBASH-CHANDRA-FERNANDO-v.-KAPILARATNE-OFFICER-IN-CHARGE-POLICE-STATIO.pdf SUBBASH CHANDRA FERNANDOv. KAPILARATNE, OFFICER-IN-CHARGE, POLICE STATION,GAMPAHA AND OTHERS SUPREME COURT, BANDARANAYAKE, J., M. D. H. FERNANDO, J. AND KULATUNGA, J. S.C. APPLICATION NO. 1/91 02 AUGUST, 1991, AND 11 AND 26 SEPTEMBER, 1991 Fundamental Rights – Violation of fundamental rights under Articles 11,13(1) and (2) – Excessive detention – Test to be…
ABEYSEKERA v. CAROLIS
001-SLLR-SLLR-1992-V-1-ABEYSEKERA-v.-CAROLIS.pdf ABEYSEKERA v.CAROLIS SUPREME COURTBANDARANAYAKE, J. AMERASINGHE, J. ANDDHEERARATNE, J. S.C. NO. 44/91 A. NO. 540/88 (F) C. MT. LAVINIA 2540/RE05 FEBRUARY 1992. Landlord and tenant – Reasonable requirement – Sections 22( 1) (bb) and (1C) ofthe Rent Act No. 7 of 1972as amended by Law No. 10 of 1977 and Act No. 55…
MENDIS AND ANOTHER v. THE REPUBLIC OF SRI LANKA
017-SLLR-SLLR-1992-V-1-MENDIS-AND-ANOTHER-v.-THE-REPUBLIC-OF-SRI-LANKA.pdf MENDIS AND ANOTHER v.THE REPUBLIC OF SRI LANKA SUPREME COURTCOLIN -THOME, J. . RANASINGHE, J. AND L. H. DE ALWIS, J. S.C. APPEAL N0..33/84HC GALLE NO. 51701 AND 02 OCTOBER 1985 Criminal Procedure – Section 334(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure Act No.15 of 1979 – Right of Court of Appeal to…
SULAIMAN v. ABOOBAKKAR
033-SLLR-SLLR-1992-V-1-SULAIMAN-v.-ABOOBAKKAR.pdf SULAIMAN v.ABOOBAKKAR COURT OF APPEALWIJETUNGE, J. & ANANDACOOMARASWAMY, J. A. APPLICATION NO. 1159/90 C. COLOMBO NO. 6861/RE05 FEBRUARY 1991 Landlord and tenant – Rent and ejectment – Suit on ground of reasonablerequirement of premises – Rent Act, section 22(2)(bb). Held: To sue the tenant on the ground of reasonable requirement, the landlord shouldnot…
COSTA v. ROWELL
002-SLLR-SLLR-1992-V-1-COSTA-v.-ROWELL.pdf COSTA v.ROWELL COURT OF APPEALWIJETUNGA, J. & ISMAIL, J. A. NO. 27/83(F) C. NEGOMBO NO. 2653/L5 AND 12 JUNE 1991 Servitude of cartway – Prescription – Necessity – Division of larger land intosmaller Lots. Held: Where a larger land, one of the boundaries of which, is a public roadway servingalso as access, is…
ARUMUGAM v. THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL AND ANOTHER
018-SLLR-SLLR-1992-V-1-ARUMUGAM-v.-THE-ATTORNEY-GENERAL-AND-ANOTHER.pdf ARUMUGAM v. THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL AND ANOTHER. SUPREME COURT, COLIN-THOME, J., RANASINGHE, J. ANDRODRIGO, J. RE-ENROLMENT NO. A 8189, 11 OCTOBER 1984 Attorney-at-Law – Application for re-enrolment – Conditions necessary. Held: A petitioner who seeks re-enrolment must adduce cogent proof that he hasredeemed his character which he had once lost. The period of good…
SIRISENA v. GINIGE
034-SLLR-SLLR-1992-V-1-SIRISENA-v.-GINIGE.pdf SIRISENA v. GINIGE COURT OF APPEALGUNAWARDANA, J. ANDWIJEYARATNE, J. D.C. ANURADHAPURA NO. 10225/M ' C.A. APPEAL NO. 240/84 (F) 06 JUNE, 1992. (Written submissions: 24 July and 12 October, 1992) Defamation – Rule of pleading requiring that the very words upon which theallegation of defamation is founded, should be set out in the…