Category / NLR_V_56
A. M. M. FUARD , Appellant ,and A. R. WEERASURIYA , Respondent
004-NLR-NLR-V-56-A.-M.-M.-FUARD-Appellant-and-A.-R.-WEERASURIYA-Respondent.pdf 12 Fuard f>*' [In the Privy Council]" Present: Lord Porter, Lord Asquith of Blshopstone, LordKeith of Avonholm and Mr. L. M. D. de SilvaM. M. FUARD, Appellant, and A. R. WEERASURIYA, Respondent t Privy Council Appeal No. 41 of 19538. C. 387—D. C. Colombo, 18,596 Proctor and client—Fiduciary relationship—Conflict between interest and duty—Duty of…
C. V. S. CORERA, Appellant , and S. MUTTUCUMARU et al , Respondents
020-NLR-NLR-V-56-C.-V.-S.-CORERA-Appellant-and-S.-MUTTUCUMARU-et-al-Respondents.pdf 80 Got era v. bfuttttcumarti 1954Present : Gunasekara J.C. V. S. CORERA, Appellant, and S. ' MUTTUCUMARU et ah,Respondents S. C. 7—G. R. Colombo, 46,054 Rent Restriction Act, No. 29 of 1948—Joint landlords—“ Reasonable requirement"of premises for some only of them—Tenant's liability then to be ejected—Sections13 (7) (c), 27—Interpretation Ordinance {Cap. 2), s. 2.…
M. P. S. SHAHUL HAMEED , Appellant , and COMMISSIONER FOR REGISTRATION OF INDIAN
036-NLR-NLR-V-56-M.-P.-S.-SHAHUL-HAMEED-Appellant-and-COMMISSIONER-FOR-REGISTRATION-OF-INDIAN.pdf 152 Shahul Hameed v. Commissioner for Registration of Indian and Pakistani Residents 1954Present : Nagallngam S.F.J.M.P. S. SHAHUL. HAMEED, Appellant, and COMMISSIONER FORREGISTRATION OF INDIAN AND PAKISTANI RESIDENTS, Respondent S. C. 988—Application No. D765 Indian and Pakistani Residents (Citizenship) Act, No. 3 of 1949—Section 6, as amended, by Act No. 45 of 1952, s.…
P. SARNELIS APPUHAMY, Appellant , and H. V. RAMISWARA, Respondent
052-NLR-NLR-V-56-P.-SARNELIS-APPUHAMY-Appellant-and-H.-V.-RAMISWARA-Respondent.pdf NAGALINGAM S.P.J.—Sarnelia Appuhamy v. Ram Is war a 221 1954Present: Nagalingam S.P.J. P. SARNELIS APPUHAMY, Appellant, and H. V. RAMISWARA, Respondent S. G. 75—C. R. Colombo, 40,917 o Condictio indobiti—Auction sale of immovable property—Notarial fees—Exorbitantsum charged—Payment made under mistake of fact—Remedy of purchaser. A purchaser at a public' auction of immovable property is entitled…
S. J. V. CHELVANAYAKAM, Petitioner ,and S. NATESAN, Respondent
068-NLR-NLR-V-56-S.-J.-V.-CHELVANAYAKAM-Petitioner-and-S.-NATESAN-Respondent.pdf DE SILVA J.—Chelvanayakam v. Natesan 271 1954Present : de Silva J.S. J, V. CHELVANAYAKAM, Petitioner, and S. NATESAN,Respondent. Election Petition No. 17 of 1952, Kankesanturai Parliamentary election—Agency—Principles applicable—Proof of agency—Election offences—Degree of proof required. In Partiamentary elections the relationship between a candidate and hisagent is similar to that between master and servant. A candidate…
RUPARATNE, Appellant ,and THE QUEEN , Respondent
084-NLR-NLR-V-56-RUPARATNE-Appellant-and-THE-QUEEN-Respondent.pdf Ruporatne.v. The Queen 353- [Coubt of Criminal Appeal] 1955Present : Rose C.J. (President), Gunasekara J.and Weerasooriya J.RUPARATNE, Appellant, omd THE QUEEN, Respondent. Appeal 10 of 1955, with Application 13 S. C. 34—AI. G. Kuninegula, 8,934 Criminal Procedure—Evidence of accused—Contradictory of previous statement to-Police – Eight to -prove such statement—Evidence in rehuttul—Impeachingcredit of witness—Evidence Ordinance,…
V. E. B. DE SILVA et al .,Petitioners, and MERVYN FERNANDO, Respondent
100-NLR-NLR-V-56-V.-E.-B.-DE-SILVA-et-al-.Petitioners-and-MERVYN-FERNANDO-Respondent.pdf 4on CRATIA15N J.—rfe Silva v. Mervyn Fernando 1955Present: Gratiaen J. V. 15. B. DE SILVA, cl al., Petitioners, anti MERVYNFERNANDO, Respondent S. C. 256—Application in revision in C. R. Panadure, 13,782 Court of Requests—Costs—Taxation as between parly and parly—Witnesses’expenses —Discretion of Court-—Civil Procedure Code, Part .1 of Schedule 11. Under Tart 3 of Schedule…
EMIL SAVUNDRANAYAGAM , Appellant , and COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, Respondent
116-NLR-NLR-V-56-EMIL-SAVUNDRANAYAGAM-Appellant-and-COMMISSIONER-OF-INCOME-TAX-Respondent.pdf GRATIAEN J.—Savundranayagam v. Commissioner of Income Tax 457 1965Present: Gratlaen J. and Sansoni J. EMTL SAVUNDRANAYAGAM, Appellant, and COMMISSIONEROP INCOME TAX, Respondent S. C. 323 mid 325—In the matter oj a case stated for the opinion of theSupreme Court under the provisions of Section 74 of the IncomeTax Ordinance (Cap. 88) Income tux—C.i.f. contract—Payment…
IN RE EVELYN WARNAKULASURIYA
132-NLR-NLR-V-56-IN-RE-EVELYN-WARNAKULASURIYA.pdf 525 Til re Evelyn Wai nnkulasuriya 1955Present.: Fernando A.J.In he EVELYN WARNAKULASURIYA Habeas Corpus Petition No. 424—M. O. Hatton llalioos Corpus—CtisUnlg of child—Parents right thereto—Factors for consideration—Adujttiun of Children Ordinance, 1041—Children and Young Persons Ordinanceof 1030, ss. 31, 3o. Petitioner claimed tho custody of her daughter (1st respondent) aged 15-Tho 2nd respondent, tho Mother…
H. JAYARAM et al , Appellants, and SARAPH (P. S. 1958), Respondent
005-NLR-NLR-V-56-H.-JAYARAM-et-al-Appellants-and-SARAPH-P.-S.-1958-Respondent.pdf 22PULLE J.—.Jayamm «&' Saraph 1954Present: Pulle J. H. JAYARAM kt al., Appellants, and SARAPH (P. S. 1958), Respondent S. C. 928-929—M. G. Nuwara Eliya, 8,404. Unlawful unsetnbit/—–Conviction of less Ilian Jive persons—Tn wltal cirrajjislnurespermissible—Urval Code. s. JiO. Whoro. arconliug it* Mio rlutrgo and tlio coro for tho prosecution. not morotlwMi six persons in all…