Category / NLR_V_54
THANGAVELAUTHAN, Appellant ,and SAVERIMUTTU et al, Respondents
009-NLR-NLR-V-54-THANGAVELAUTHAN-Appellant-and-SAVERIMUTTU-et-al-Respondents.pdf 28 Thangavelauthan v. Saverimuttu 1951Present: Gratiaen J. and Gunasekara J.THANGAVELAUTHAN, Appellant, and SAVERIMUTTU et al., Respondents S.C. 174—D. C. Point Pedro, 2,761 Trust-Sale of land by notarial deed—Parol evidence of trust or mortgage—Preventionof Frauds Ordinance, s. 2—Trusts Ordinance, s. 5 (3). 'Where a person transferred for consideration a land to another by a notarialdeed,…
A . NAGALINGAM Appellant , and A. THANABALASINGHAM et al Respondents
025-NLR-NLR-V-54-A-.-NAGALINGAM-Appellant-and-A.-THANABALASINGHAM-et-al-Respondents.pdf Nagalingam v. Thanabcdasingham 121 [Tit the Privy Council] 1952Present: Lord Porter, Lord Tucker, Lord Cohen,The Right Hon. T. Rinfret (Chief justice of Canada)and Sir Lionel LeachA. NAGALINGAM, Appellant, and A. THANABALASINGHAM et al.RespondentsPrivy Council Appeal No. 24 of 1951S. C. 335—D. G. Kandy, 2,308 Donation—Minor—Acceptance—Revocation—Fideicommissum—Single and separatefideicommissa—Death of a fideicommissary—Devolution of share—Jusaccrescendi. A gift…
KASIPILLAI et al ,Petitioners,and NAGALINGA KURUKKAL Respondent
041-NLR-NLR-V-54-KASIPILLAI-et-al-Petitionersand-NAGALINGA-KURUKKAL-Respondent.pdf GTTNASEKABA J.—•Kasipillai v. NagaZinga Kwruklcal 183 1952Present : Gunasekara J. and Swan J.KASIPILLAI et al., Petitioners, and NAGALINGAKURTJKKAL, Respondent S. C. 349—Application for cxmdiUonal leave to appeal to the PrivyCouncil in S.C. 51/D.C. Jaffna, 5,694 Privy Council—Application for leave to appeal—Notice to opposite party—Requirementof information as to ground of appeal—Appeals (Privy Council) Ordinance{Cap. 85),…
B.H.DE SILVA ,Appellant ,and EKANAYAKE (Sub-Inspector of Police), Respondent
057-NLR-NLR-V-54-B.H.DE-SILVA-Appellant-and-EKANAYAKE-Sub-Inspector-of-Police-Respondent.pdf Silva o. Ekanayahe 235 1952Present: Swan J. H. DE SILVA, Appellant, and EKASAYATCF! (Sub-Inspector ofPolice), Respondent S. G. 152—M. C., Galle, 2,213 Rubber Thefts Ordinance [Cap. 29)—Section 14—Meaning of “ books ”—Direction of Government Agent. If on an inspection under section 10 of the Rubber Thefts Ordinance it isdiscovered that there is a discrepancy…
R. L. GUNASEKARA, Appellant, and M.A.S. MATHEW, Respondent
073-NLR-NLR-V-54-R.-L.-GUNASEKARA-Appellant-and-M.A.S.-MATHEW-Respondent.pdf Gunaaehera v. Mathew 299 1953Present: Gunasekara J.R. L. GUNASEKERA, Appellant, and M. A. S. MATHEW,RespondentS. G. 84—C. E. Colombo, 34,058 Rent Restriction Act, No. 29 of 1948—Section 13 (1)—•Premises required for landlord’s son over 18 years of age—Right to eject tenant—“ Member of the family ”— “ Immediate and present ” need of landlord.…
HINNIAPPUHAMY, Appellant, and WILISINDAHAMY, Respondent
089-NLR-NLR-V-54-HINNIAPPUHAMY-Appellant-and-WILISINDAHAMY-Respondent.pdf SWAN" J.—Biinniappuhamy v. Wilisindahamy 373 1952Present: Swan J. HINNIAPPUH A At Y, Appellant, and WILISIN’ D AH AM Y,Respondent S. C. 461—-M.G. Galle, 1947 Maintenance Ordinance {Cap. 76)—Order for maintenance of child—Extension of suchorder—Scope of—Right of appeal—Sections 2, 7 and 17. Appeal lies from an order made under the proviso to section. 7 of…
SAPARAMADU et al , Appellant , and SANDERATNE et al , Respondents
105-NLR-NLR-V-54-SAPARAMADU-et-al-Appellant-and-SANDERATNE-et-al-Respondents.pdf 440 NAGALINGAM A.C. J.—Saparamadu v. Sanderatne 1952 Present : Nagalingam A.G.J. and Gunasekara J. SAPARAMADU.. et al., Appellants, and SANDERATNE et al., Respondents S. C. 285—D. C. Colombo, 4,699 Partition Ordinance (Gap. 56)—Section 2—Order for sale—Special circumstancesnecessary. The policy of the law is to favour the partition of a common land rather thanto direct…
K. RAMALINGAM ,Petitioner ,and V. KUMARASWAMY, Respondent
121-NLR-NLR-V-54-K.-RAMALINGAM-Petitioner-and-V.-KUMARASWAMY-Respondent.pdf 494 Ramalingam v. JCumaraswamy 1953 Present: H. A. de Silva J. TC RAMALINGAM, Petitioner, and V. KUMAR AS WAMY,RespondentElection Petition No. 16 (Chavakachcheri)—Inquiry into objectionraised by the Respondent.'' Election Petition—*Presentation of petition—Gazette notification as mode of giving-notice to respondent—Conditions precedent—Appointment of agent—Signi-ficance of Registrar’s register—Ceylon (Parliamentary Elections') Order inCouncil, 1946, Schedule 3, Rules 9,…
K. H. L. M. L. LATIFA UMMA , Appellant, and K. O. A. JEMALDEEN, Respondent
137-NLR-NLR-V-54-K.-H.-L.-M.-L.-LATIFA-UMMA-Appellant-and-K.-O.-A.-JEMALDEEN-Respondent.pdf ROSE C.J.—hatifa Umma ®. Jemaldeen 509 1952Present: Rose C.J. and Gratiaen J.K. H. L. M. Li. LATIFA UMMA, Appellant, and K. O. A. JEMALDEEN» Respondent S. G. 267—D. G. Kegalle, 5,911 Sale of immovable property—Covenant to -warrant and defend title—Eviction byjudicial process—Failure of vendee to give vendor notice of the legal proceedings—Action by vendee…
OBIYAS APPUHAMY ,Appellant , and THE QUEEN ,Respondent
010-NLR-NLR-V-54-OBIYAS-APPUHAMY-Appellant-and-THE-QUEEN-Respondent.pdf 32 Obiyas Appuhamy v. The Queen [Court of Criminal Appeal] 1952 Present : Nagalingam A.C.J. (President), Gunasekara J. and Pulle J.OBIYAS APPUHAMY, Appellant, and THE QUEEN, _ Respondent Appeal 11 with Application 14 of 1952S. C. 17—M. C. Kanadulla, 7,229 Confession to police officerInadmissibility—Not restricted to actual terms of the statement—Evidence Ordinance (Cap. 11),…