Category / NLR_V_53
SUPPIAH et al., Appellants, and SITUNAYAKE, Respondent
013-NLR-NLR-V-53-SUPPIAH-et-al.-Appellants-and-SITUNAYAKE-Respondent.pdf Suppiah v. Situnayake 1630Present : Basnayake J., and Pulle J. SUPPIAH et al., Appellants, and SITUNAYAKE, Respondent % S.C. 165—D. C„ Kandy, 2,413 Contract—Notarial agreement for sale and purchase of land~Provision for durationof three months only—Evidence of subsequent oral “ extensions " of timelimit—Inadmissible—Evidence Ordinance {Cap. 11), s. 92, proviso (4)—Pre-vention of Frauds…
SIVASUBRAMANIAM, Appellant, and ALAGAMUTTU, Respondent
029-NLR-NLR-V-53-SIVASUBRAMANIAM-Appellant-and-ALAGAMUTTU-Respondent.pdf 160 NAGAL/INGAM J.—Sicasubramanian: v. Alagamuttu 1950 Present: N&gallngam J. and Gunasekara J.SIVASUBRAMANIAM, Appellant, and ALAGAMUTTU,Respondent S. C. 4:49—D. C. Jaffna, 3,818 Prescription—Deposit of sum of money—Payment of interest—When cause of actionarises—Requirement of formal demand prior to institution of action—In what circumstances necessaryLoan of money belonging to third party—Right of lender to sue in…
M. E. DE SILVA, Appellant, and THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, Respondent
061-NLR-NLR-V-53-M.-E.-DE-SILVA-Appellant-and-THE-COMMISSIONER-OF-INCOME-TAX-Respondent.pdf 280 M. E. de Silva v. The Commissioner of Inccfme Tax 1951 Present: Gratiaen J.M. E. de SILVA, Appellant, and THE COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX, Respondent S. C. 507 with Application 512—M. C. Colombo, 5,061 Income Tax Ordinance (Cap. 188)—Tax due from Company—Proceedings takenagainst Director personally for recovery of the tax—Conclusive nature of certi-ficate…
UKKU ABNDA, Appellant, adn TIKIRI BANDA, Respondent
077-NLR-NLR-V-53-UKKU-ABNDA-Appellant-adn-TIKIRI-BANDA-Respondent.pdf DIAS S.P.J.—Vkku Baud,, r. Tikiri Banda 331 1951Present: Dias S.P.J.UKKU BANDA, Appellant, and TIKIRI BANDA, RespondentS. C. 185—C. It. Panwila. SI4 Anda cultivation—Informal agreement—Quantum of proof necessary—Preventionof Frauds Ordinance (Cap. 57), Section 3 (1). Plaintiff alleged that by an informal agreement he and the defendant agreedthat the plaintiff was to cultivate a piece…
KADIBHOY, Appellant, and KESEYANU, Respondent
093-NLR-NLR-V-53-KADIBHOY-Appellant-and-KESEYANU-Respondent.pdf 430 Kadibhoy v. Keseyanu Present:Nagalingam A.C.J. KADIBHOY,Appellant,and KESEYANU, Respondent S.C. 154—C.R. Colombo, 27,784 Rent Restriction Act—Notice to quit—Effect of acceptance of rent thereafter—“ Waiver of notice ”. Where a “ statutory landlord ” governed by the Bent Eestriction Act acceptsthe rent paid to him by a “ statutory tenant " even after termination…
W. C. FERNANDO, Petitoner, and L. DE SILVA, Respondent
030-NLR-NLR-V-53-W.-C.-FERNANDO-Petitoner-and-L.-DE-SILVA-Respondent.pdf 154 W. C. Fernando o. L. de Silva 1051Present: Rose C. J. W. C. EERNANDO, Petitioner, and Ij. DE SILVA, Respondent S. C. 100—In the Matter of an Application for a Writ ofQuo Warranto on the Member for Ward No. 8, Urban Council, Moratuwa Quo Warranto—Election of member of Urban ■ Council—Spiritual intimidation…