A. E. EBERT and two others, Petitioners, and THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC TRUSTEE, an
034-NLR-NLR-V-78-A.-E.-EBERT-and-two-others-Petitioners-and-THE-ADDITIONAL-PUBLIC-TRUSTEE-an.pdf 264 PATH1BAXA, a.-—Ebert v. The Additional Public Trustee Present: Pathirana, J., Vythialingam, J., and Colin-Thome, J. A. E. EBERT and two others, Petitioners, and THE ADDITIONALPUBLIC TRUSTEE, and three others, Respondents S. C. 867/74—In the matter of an Application for a mandate inthe nature of a Writ of Certiorari and of Prohibition under…
A. B. SA,ARAKOON, Appellant and THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL, Respondent
050-NLR-NLR-V-78-A.-B.-SAARAKOON-Appellant-and-THE-ATTORNEY-GENERAL-Respondent.pdf 133 TENNEK.OON, C.J—Sainurakoon o. Attorney General Present: Tennekoon, C. J., Vythialingam, J. and Ratwatte, J.A. B. SAMARAKOON, Appellant and THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL, Respondent S. C. 52/75—D. C. Colombo 197/B Bribery—Meaning of phrase ‘ perpetrator ’ of an offence—Bribery Act, S, 16. S. 16 of the Bribery Act inter alia provides that any person whobeing…
MRS DOROTHY SILVA, Accused Appellant and INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CITY VICE SQUA
066-NLR-NLR-V-78-MRS-DOROTHY-SILVA-Accused-Appellant-and-INSPECTOR-OF-POLICE-CITY-VICE-SQUA.pdf Dorothy Silva v. inspector oj Police, Pettah Present: Pathirana, J., and Tittawella, J.MRS. DOROTHY SILVA, Accused Appellant and INSPECTOROF POLICE, CITY VICE SQUAD, PETTAH ComplainantRespondent.S. C. 12/76—M. C.—Maligakande—19422Brothels Ordinance 1889—Meaning of the term “ Brothel ” S. 2(a) of the Brothels Ordinance No. 5 of 1889 reads as follows :— “ Any person…
THE KAHATAGAHA MINES LTD., Petitioner and K. S. P. D. FERNANDO, Chief Valuer, a
035-NLR-NLR-V-78-THE-KAHATAGAHA-MINES-LTD.-Petitioner-and-K.-S.-P.-D.-FERNANDO-Chief-Valuer-a.pdf TENNEKOON, C.J.—Kahatagaha Mines Ltd. v. Fernando, Chief Valuer 273 1976 Present: Tennekoon, C.J. Rajaratnam, J., and Wanasundera, J. THE KAHATAGAHA MINES LTD., Petitioner and K. S. P. D.FERNANDO, Chief Valuer, and another, Respondents S.C. 758/75—Application for Writs of Certiorari, Prohibition and Mandamus Mines and Minerals Law No. 4 of 1973—Sections 58, 64—Pro-cedure under…
A. L. PAKIR SAIBU, Appellant, and P. S. KAIRUL RASIKA, Repsondent
051-NLR-NLR-V-78-A.-L.-PAKIR-SAIBU-Appellant-and-P.-S.-KAIRUL-RASIKA-Repsondent.pdf SHAKVANAMDA, J.—Fakir Saibu o. KairuJ. Ra&ika 445 1976 Present: Pathirana, J., Sharvananda, J., and Rat watte, J. A. L. PAKIR SAIBU, Appellant, and P. S. KAIRUL RASIKA, Respondent S, C. 458/68—D. C. Matara 2623/M Evidence Ordinance-—Sections 92, and 99— Applicability of Section 92to persons not parties to the instrument and not their representa-tives…
K. NADARAJA, Appellant and THE REPUBLIC OF SRI LANKA, Respondent
067-NLR-NLR-V-78-K.-NADARAJA-Appellant-and-THE-REPUBLIC-OF-SRI-LANKA-Respondent.pdf 668 Nadaraja v.Republic of Sri Lanka 1976 Present; Wimalaratne, J., Weeraratne, J, and Colin-Thome, J. K. NADARAJA, Appellant and THE REPUBLIC OF SRI LANKA, Respondent. S. C. 76/75—D. C. Colombo B/233 Bribery Act—Interpretation of the phrase “ a person who while having dealings of any hind with the Government ”—Bribery Act. S. 21.…
S. A. KANAGASABAI, Petitioner, and M. K. MYLWAGANAM, Respondent
036-NLR-NLR-V-78-S.-A.-KANAGASABAI-Petitioner-and-M.-K.-MYLWAGANAM-Respondent.pdf 280 S H ARVANAN DA J.■—Kanagasabai v. Alyl vagan am 1976 Present : Sharvananda, J., and Wanasundera, J.S. A. KANAGASABAI, Petitioner, and M- K. MYLWAGANAM, Respondent S. C. Application 471/76—M.C. Colombo 42282/1 Administration of Justice Law—Sections 62, 63, 65—Relevance of 'suitpending in civil court—Conditions precedent to the exercise ofjurisdiction—Meaning of dispute affecting land.…
NESARATNAM, window of KANDIAHPILLAI, Appellant and K. VAITHILINGAM, Responden
052-NLR-NLR-V-78-NESARATNAM-window-of-KANDIAHPILLAI-Appellant-and-K.-VAITHILINGAM-Responden.pdf TENNEKOON, C.J.—Nesaratnarn v. Vailhilingam 457 1975 Present: Tennekoon, C. J., Pathirana, J., and Vythialingam, J. NESARATNAM, widow of KANDIAHPILLAI, Appellant and K.VAITHILINGAM, Respondent S. C. 264/70 (F)—D. C. Jaffna D/1092 Civil Procedure Code—Sections 341, 338 (3), 394 (2)—Whether executorde son tort can be made respondent to application under Section341(1)—Do the words “executor or…
M. S. PERUMAL, Petitioner, and E. NANAYAKKARA, Respondent
068-NLR-NLR-V-78-M.-S.-PERUMAL-Petitioner-and-E.-NANAYAKKARA-Respondent.pdf Perumal v. Nanayalckara 873 1977Present .-Weeraratne, J., Vythialingam, J., and Colin Thome, J. M. S. PERUMAL, Petitioner, and E. NANAYAKKARA, Respondent S C. 55/76—D. C. Colombo 988/43/73 Conciliation Boards Act-—Settlement of dispute between landlord andtenant—Validity of such settlement—Rent Act No. 7 of 1972—Section 22 thereof. In an application to revise a settlement of…
THE ESTATES AND AGENCY COMPANY LTD., Petitioner, and P. J. S. A. PERERA and ot
037-NLR-NLR-V-78-THE-ESTATES-AND-AGENCY-COMPANY-LTD.-Petitioner-and-P.-J.-S.-A.-PERERA-and-ot.pdf The Estates and Agency Company^Ltd. v. Perera 289 1975 Present : Weeraratne, J., Sliarvananda, J., and Ratwatte, J. THE ESTATES AND AGENCY COMPANY LTD., Petitioner,and P. J. S. A. PERERA and others, Respondents S. C. 2/73—Applications for Mandates in the nature of writs ofCertiorari and Prohibition under Section 42 of the CourtsOrdinance. Industrial…